SAFEGROUNDS Guide to the comparison of contaminated land management options

This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information on the subject matter covered. It is sold and/or distributed with the understanding that neither the authors nor the publisher is thereby engaged in rendering a specific legal or any other professional service. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the publication, no warranty or fitness is provided or implied, and the authors and publisher shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage arising from its use. All rights reserved. This document is freely available to download, however if you wish to use any part of the document, such as the figures, text or technical information for reproduction elsewhere (in other documents or publications), please contact the Publishing Department for more details on copyright terms and charges at: Reader interest This guidance has been developed primarily for site owners, site operators and their contractors. It is also addressed to governmental and non-governmental organisations and other groups within the public Classification AVAILABILITY Unrestricted CONTENT Guidance STATUS Committee-guided/ Stakeholder dialogue Summary The SAFEGROUNDS Learning Network uses participatory approaches to develop and disseminate good practice guidance for the management of contaminated land on nuclear-licensed and defence sites in the UK. It is a large and well-established network strongly supported by a wide range of participating groups. A central theme of SAFEGROUNDS guidance is the need for the systematic comparison of management options for contaminated land, in terms of the factors important to site owners/operators and other stakeholders, to inform decision making. This document provides guidance on comparing contaminated land management options. It does not consider the decision making step, which is covered in the main SAFEGROUNDS guidance. As well as explaining the general approach, the guide presents selected methods and discusses how to choose the most appropriate one for a given contaminated land situation. As different situations demand differing levels of rigour, detail and stakeholder involvement, the methods presented cover situations from the simple (eg a small patch of well defined contamination on an operating site) to the complex (eg a restoration strategy for a complex site). Properly applied, all methods will fulfil the SAFEGROUNDS key principles and are consistent with the SAFEGROUNDS Good practice guidance for the management of contaminated land on nuclear-licensed and defence sites (Hill et al, 2009) and relevant regulatory requirements. Worked examples …